Scroll to explore
Competencies
Thinking

Logical Reasoning

Build valid arguments, detect fallacies, and follow chains of cause and effect.

LogicPremisesConclusionDeductionInductionFallaciesAd hominemFalse dilemmaStraw manCorrelation vs. causationGeneralizationValidityContradictionConditionalsIf-thenFalsifiabilityEvidenceArgueCounter-argumentSequenceLogical chainReasoning errorsFormal thinkingSyllogismPuzzlesRiddlesAlgorithmsPatternRule and exception
"

Logic will get you from A to B. Imagination will take you everywhere.

— Albert Einstein

Mastery progression

Emerging

Confuses opinion with argument. Does not detect contradictions. Accepts conclusions without examining the premises.

Developing

Follows simple logical sequences. Detects obvious contradictions. Needs help building formal arguments.

Proficient

Builds arguments with clear premises and conclusions. Detects common fallacies. Distinguishes correlation from causation.

Expert

Handles deductive and inductive reasoning fluently. Evaluates the formal validity of complex arguments. Constructs solid logical chains.

Zone of proximal development
Safe zone
  • Complete a simple logical sequence (if A then B)
  • Detect when two statements contradict each other
  • Order the steps of a process in sequence
Opportunity zone
  • Build an argument with explicit premises and a conclusion
  • Identify common fallacies such as the straw man or false dilemma
  • Distinguish between correlation and causation using real data
  • Evaluate whether a conclusion logically follows from the premises
Future zone
  • Analyze complex formal arguments with multiple chained premises
  • Design logical proofs to verify hypotheses
  • Detect subtle fallacies in sophisticated discourse

Questions that activate it

Tap a card to see the coaching guide

1/8?

Is that because A causes B, or because A and B happen together?

Tap to flip
1/8 Coaching guide

The confusion between correlation and causation is one of the most common logical errors. Use it with data, statistics, and news.

Tap to return
2/8?

What premise do you need for that conclusion to be valid?

Tap to flip
2/8 Coaching guide

Reverses the process: instead of going from premises to conclusion, ask them to find the missing premise. A powerful logical exercise.

Tap to return
3/8?

Is there a third option besides those two?

Tap to flip
3/8 Coaching guide

Detects the false dilemma. Students often present only two options. There are almost always more. Ideal for debates and dilemmas.

Tap to return
4/8?

Is that always true or only in this case?

Tap to flip
4/8 Coaching guide

Teaches how to distinguish between a general rule and a particular example. Avoids hasty generalizations. Very useful in science and history.

Tap to return
5/8?

What would have to happen for this to be false?

Tap to flip
5/8 Coaching guide

Introduces the concept of falsifiability. If nothing can prove something is false, it's probably not a solid argument.

Tap to return
6/8?

Can you explain your reasoning step by step?

Tap to flip
6/8 Coaching guide

Makes the logical chain explicit. Many students reach the right conclusion but can't explain how. The process matters as much as the result.

Tap to return
7/8?

Are you attacking the idea or the person who said it?

Tap to flip
7/8 Coaching guide

Detects the ad hominem, one of the most frequent fallacies in school life. Teaches students to separate the argument from the person arguing.

Tap to return
8/8?

What evidence would you need to change your mind?

Tap to flip
8/8 Coaching guide

Evaluates whether the student holds a logical or dogmatic position. If no evidence would change their mind, they are not reasoning — they are believing.

Tap to return
1 / 8
Did you know...?

A study showed that students who learn to identify logical fallacies are 45% more resistant to misinformation on social media.

Roozenbeek & van der Linden, 2019 — Cognition

Ideas for developing it

With puzzlesPrimary
  • Solve logic puzzles that require step-by-step deduction
  • Who-is-who games with yes-or-no questions
In debatesSecondary
  • Identify the fallacy in an argument before responding
  • Build a counter-argument that attacks the premises, not the person
With fallaciesSecondary
  • Fallacy catalog: each week study one fallacy and find real-world examples
  • Fallacy bingo: mark fallacies that appear in news or advertising
In mathematicsPrimary and secondary
  • Explain why a formula works, not just how to use it
  • Find the error in a proof that contains an invalid step
With dataSecondary
  • Analyze misleading graphs and explain what logical trick they use
  • Given two correlated data points, investigate whether there is causation or coincidence
With programmingSecondary
  • Write pseudocode with conditionals: if X then Y; if not, Z
  • Debug an algorithm by finding where the logic breaks down
In scienceSecondary
  • Design an experiment that can falsify a hypothesis
  • Analyze whether a scientific conclusion follows from the data presented
In everyday lifeAll levels
  • Analyze an advertisement: what logic does it use to persuade you?
  • Evaluate a rumor: what evidence is there? who said it? does it make sense?
Through gamesPrimary
  • Board games that require logical strategy (chess, Mastermind, Set)
  • Sudoku and other logic puzzles with progressive difficulty