Swipe to explore
Pedagogies Social-Emotional

Pedagogy of Tenderness

Tenderness as a political and pedagogical act. Born in Latin America from working with children in contexts of exclusion.

TendernessChild AgencyChildren's RightsLatin AmericaDignityBondAll Levels
Students know themselves as subjects of rights — they speak of their rights naturally and assert them respectfully
Tenderness
In a school in Villa El Salvador (Lima), students participate in a weekly assembly where they decide on real aspects of school life: recess schedules, use of the yard, community projects. The teacher facilitates, does not decide. Children exercise real agency, not simulated.
Alejandro Cussianovich

What is it?

The pedagogy of tenderness is a proposal born in Latin America, developed by Alejandro Cussianovich from his work with working children, adolescents (NATs) in Peru. Its premise is that tenderness is not a soft or romantic feeling: it is a political act. Being tender in a context of violence is an act of resistance. Educating with tenderness is recognizing the dignity of the other.

Unlike Noddings' 'pedagogy of care' (individual ethics of care), the pedagogy of tenderness is collective and political. It is not only about the teacher caring for the student, but about building a culture where tenderness is a form of social relationship. Cussianovich defines it as 'the capacity to welcome the other without conditions, to recognize them as a subject of rights and protagonist of their own history'.

The approach is deeply connected with child agency: children are not objects of passive protection, but subjects with voice, decision-making capacity, and the right to participate. This challenges both the authoritarian and the overprotective teacher. Tenderness empowers, it does not infantilize.

"

Tenderness is the most radical expression of respect. It is recognizing in the other someone who deserves to be treated with absolute dignity.

— Alejandro Cussianovich

What does it look like in class?

In a school in Villa El Salvador (Lima), students participate in a weekly assembly where they decide on real aspects of school life: recess schedules, use of the yard, community projects. The teacher facilitates, does not decide. Children exercise real agency, not simulated.

The teacher starts each class with a welcoming ritual: looks each student in the eyes, greets them by name, and asks something personal. When a student arrives upset, they do not send them to their seat — they kneel to their height and give them a moment. Tenderness is a concrete gesture, not a speech.

In a project on children's rights, students from a school in Bogotá interview working children from the neighboring market. Not as objects of study, but as peers with valuable experience. The project culminates in a public letter to the mayor. Tenderness translates into action for justice.

A teacher in Cochabamba (Bolivia) works with students who are children of miners. Instead of victimizing them, they ask them to teach the class what they know about minerals, extraction processes, and the earth. The student's knowledge — born from their context — is valued as legitimate knowledge. That is epistemic tenderness.

Signs it works

  • Students know themselves as subjects of rights — they speak of their rights naturally and assert them respectfully
  • The classroom is a space where one can be vulnerable without it being used against anyone
  • Students participate in real decisions, not in simulations of participation
  • The teacher recognizes and values the knowledge students bring from their context, family, and community
  • Conflicts are addressed from connection and recognition, not from power or punishment

Common mistakes

✕

Confusing tenderness with overprotection — Cussianovich's tenderness is demanding, not indulgent

✕

Romanticizing poverty or child labor — tenderness does not deny injustice, it confronts it

✕

Reducing child agency to voting on trivial activities — real agency involves genuine decision-making power

✕

Thinking tenderness is only for vulnerable children — every person needs to be recognized and welcomed

Key thinkers

A
Alejandro Cussianovich

Peruvian educator, founder of the NATs (Working Children and Adolescents) movement. Principal theorist of the pedagogy of tenderness. His work at IFEJANT (Training Institute for Educators of Young, Adolescent, and Working Children) is a reference throughout Latin America.

M
Manfred Liebel

German sociologist based in Latin America. Has researched and documented child agency and the rights of working children. Co-author with Cussianovich of several key texts.

E
Elvira Figueroa

Peruvian educator who has brought the pedagogy of tenderness to formal schools. Her work shows how the approach functions beyond contexts of exclusion, in any classroom.